Weaponized Hypnosis Part 2: The Manchurian Candidate

October 21, 2018

In this article we will look further into the use of “weaponized hypnosis” by the military and intelligence agencies. In part 1 we took a look at the CIA’s “Kubark Manual”, also referred to as “The CIA Document of Human Manipulation”. The Kubark manual covered using hypnosis, often combined with drugs, to interrogate enemy prisoners. Here’s the link for that essay:


Now we move on to the nitty-gritty of actual techniques that were intended to build agents that could deliver messages that the enemy could not extract, or kill without remembering or understanding the event. With programming like this, it would be nearly impossible to trace any actions by the agent back to the source of the plot; it would create a “Manchurian Candidate”.

The term “Manchurian Candidate” was coined in Richard Condon’s novel by the same name, later made into a shocking movie that introduced the concept of programmed assassins to the viewing audience. The origins of the concept however, go back to the Korean war, and the troubling robotic confessions by US pow’s of committing war crimes. It turns out the American military committed many, many crimes in that war, including dropping containers of fleas infested with plague on villages.


Whether the North Koreans and Chinese had effectively “brainwashed” the American Prisoners or not, it was an opportunity for American intelligence to pull out all the stops and conduct similar experiments to catch up with “Communist mind-control” techniques.

Let’s begin by looking at the deeply researched book by John Marks called “The Search For The Manchurian Candidate”, published in 1979. While hypnosis is only one of the techniques the CIA used to bend minds, that is the subject of this article. There are at least 16 main citations regarding hypnosis, and the text eludes to deeper involvement.

Marks writes:
“Since World War 2, the United States government, led by the Central Intelligence Agency, has searched secretly for ways to control human behavior”.
Such work “touched on the fantasies of the mind- accessible, in ancient legends, to witches and wizards who used spells and potions to bring people under their sway”.

Drawing on techniques used by the Nazis, pioneers such as George Estabrooks began to unpack the human mind. Estabrooks will be the subject of a future article.
“Fearful that the communists might have used drugs and hypnosis on prisoners, a senior CIA official used exactly the same techniques on refugees and returned prisoners from Eastern Europe.”

The point man in 1950 was Sheffield Edwards, who Marks says “would personally handle joint CIA-Mafia operations..”. The project was code-named “Bluebird”. Later under the leadership of Morse Allen, the CIA was given $100,000 to develop electric shock and hypnotic techniques.

The Korean War was the catalyst that drove further research. Marks comments that “By the end of the Korean War, 70 percent of the 7,190 U.S. prisoners held in China had either made confessions or signed petitions calling for an end to the American war effort in Asia. Fifteen percent collaborated fully with the Chinese, and only 5 percent resisted”. This convinced the CIA that the soldiers had been “brainwashed”, and the agency expanded the experiments.

The CIA studied the methods that the Communists were known to use internally; the Soviets used brutal humiliation and constant punishment by guards. In four to six weeks the prisoner would break down.
The Chinese were more subtle, using peer pressure from fellow inmates and a deep indoctrination of Marx and Maoist theory. Ironically, both methods seem to be in play at U.S. “Black Sites” and the prison at Guantanamo.

The CIA had no use for the subtle method. Instead, they oversaw crude experiments like the ones practiced by Dr. Ewen Cameron at The Allan Memorial Institute. Cameron experimented with “depatterning”, where hapless patients with common psychological problems had their personalities wiped clean in true brainwashing fashion. These included combinations of sensory deprivation, electroshock, and being drugged into comas for weeks at a time.
Marks describes Cameron’s use of “sleep cocktails”:

“..a staff member woke up the patient three times a day for medication that consisted of a combination of 100 mg. Thorazine, 100 mg. Nembutal, 100 mg. Seconal, 150 mg. Veronal, and 10 mg. Phenergan”.

Cameron would then begin what he called “psychic driving”, in which hours and hours of recorded instructions were played in a loop to the drugged subject. It was a process that was supposed to implant a new personality to replace the previous, depatterned personality. The poor subjects were eventually returned to their families as broken, ruined individuals from the trauma.

Code names for the projects changed from Bluebird, to Artichoke, to MKULTRA. But interestingly, in a trend that seems popular today, a privatization of the experiments pulled the techniques further from any oversight. Harold Wolff, who had conducted research on the Communist methods, began a study group called “The Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology”, drawing on medicine, anthropology, psychology, and sociology. Wolff even attempted to program Chinese refugees into U.S. agents. His plan was to brainwash them in order to shield them from Communist interrogation after they were infiltrated back into China. Marks notes:

“It is doubtful that any of Wolff’s Chinese ever returned to their homeland as CIA agents…”

Chapter 11 of “The Search For The Manchurian Candidate” is completely about hypnosis. The concept was to create an individual who would kill on command and not remember the event. Agency man Morse Allen would hypnotize various secretaries and employees, getting them to steal, set fires and even shoot their co-worker in a mock execution. Agents were given instructions under hypnosis and told they would not remember this when they were brought out of trance. In some cases, they allowed the subject to be caught and arrested to see if they could stand up to interrogation.

Techniques were developed in the laboratory and tested in field experimentation. Marks writes:

“The Counterintelligence program had three goals: 1. to induce hypnosis very rapidly in unwitting subjects; 2. to create durable amnesia; 3. to implant durable and operationally useful posthypnotic suggestion”.

All these efforts were intended to provide the CIA with deniability as to any connection with a particular assassination, but Marks concludes his analysis by saying he found no evidence that the agency had ever used these techniques to build a killer.
However, in a footnote at the end of the chapter on hypnosis, Marks writes:

“Hypnosis expert Milton Kline says he could create a patsy in three months; an assassin would take him six”.

Communist Brainwashing, The Manchurian Candidate

Richard Condon’s novel “The Manchurian Candidate” was later made into a movie starring Frank Sinatra as Major Bennett Marco, Laurence Harvey as Sargent Raymond Shaw, and Angela Lansbury as Shaw’s devious, plotting mother. The movie was remade in 2004 with a plot twist, but for this article we’ll stick with the original 1962 film.

It’s difficult to describe the plot in a few short words, but Marco and Shaw’s unit is captured in Korea and “brainwashed”. The survivors who have returned home experience nightmares and vague recollections of the experience. Sinatra’s “Marco” gradually discovers that Shaw is the key player in an assassination plot; Shaw’s stepfather is a vice presidential candidate with a McCarthy-like streak that raves anticommunist rhetoric. Shaw has been programmed to shoot the presidential candidate, leaving his stepfather to seize the reins of power.

The movie boldly showcases hypnotic mind control techniques in a way that shocked audiences and contributed to the overwhelming paranoia of the era.

Those with a real interest in the movie, may find the book “What Have They Built You To Do? – The Manchurian Candidate and Cold War America” a great companion read to the movie.
Written by Matthew Frye Jacobson and Gaspar Gonzzalez, the book examines every angle of the movie (and novel) from a cold-war perspective. Sample chapter titles include:

“Bullwhip and Smear; Reading McCarthy”
“Like Fu Manchu; Mapping Manchuria
“The Red Queen; Sexuality, Subversion, and the American Family
“Cold War Redux; From Kennedy to Reagan’s America”

“The Manchurian Candidate” was directed by John Frankenheimer, who became close to the Kennedy brothers. Frankenheimer had been contacted by John Kennedy and was encouraged by Kennedy to turn the book “Seven Days In May” -(about a military coup plot against an American President) – into a movie.

The Wikipedia entry for “Seven Days In May” states:

“President Kennedy had read Seven Days in May shortly after its publication and believed the scenario as described could actually occur in the United States. According to Frankenheimer in his director’s commentary, production of the film received encouragement and assistance from Kennedy through White House Press Secretary Pierre Salinger, who conveyed to Frankenheimer Kennedy’s wish that the film be produced and that, although the Pentagon did not want the film made, the President would arrange to be visiting Hyannis Port for a weekend when the film needed to shoot outside the White House.[7]


According to the book “What Have They Built You To Do?”, Frank Sinatra “..went to John F. Kennedy to secure his blessings” for “The Manchurian Candidate”.
“Kennedy screened “The Manchurian Candidate” at the White House on August 29, the same day that a U-2 spy plane reported that Soviet missile installations were only weeks from being completed”. (p.172)

The movie went missing for years, only to reappear on television in the 1970’s. Popular speculation was that the movie was pulled because the plot was too similar to the actual Kennedy assassination, however the book “What Have They Built You To Do?” describes that the actual reason was a contract dispute with Sinatra.

In another strange turn of events, John Frankenheimer, a friend of Robert Kennedy, drove Kennedy to the Ambassador Hotel where RFK was assassinated, seemingly by hypnotic-programmed assassin Sirhan-Sirhan:

“Frankenheimer became a close friend of Senator Robert F. Kennedy during the making of The Manchurian Candidate in 1962. In 1968, Kennedy asked Frankenheimer to make some commercials for use in the presidential campaign, at which he hoped to become the Democratic candidate. On the night he was assassinated in June 1968, it was Frankenheimer who had driven Kennedy from the Los Angeles Airport to the Ambassador Hotel for his acceptance speech.[6][14


Please note: Sirhan-Sirhan may not have been the actual assassin; multiple authors have provided evidence that the police destroyed key items from the shooting scene. Witnesses have said Sirhan was restrained and could not have fired the fatal shots. Sirhan was likely a hypnotized “patsy”.

“The Manchurian Candidate” may just be the perfect cold-war movie. It introduces the audience to mind control and a frightening level of conspiracy. It set the stage for the later movie thriller “The Parallax View”, which treads over the same mind-control patsy-assassin format.

But what is more amazing is that our CIA (and no doubt other countries spies) have been using these techniques and, despite the alleged closing of the program and the destruction of the MKULTRA files – these techniques can only have gotten more intense.

In the next article we will take a look at chapter 8 of “Using Hypnotism” by G.H. Estabrooks. The title of the chapter is “Hypnotism in Warfare”. Interestingly, Estabrooks – allegedly the first to create a “Manchurian Candidate” assassin – is only briefly mentioned in the book “The Search For The Manchurian Candidate”.

– John Titus

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RSS Northwest Research & Covert Book Report

  • Review: “Mind Games – The Assassination Of John Lennon”
    “Mind Games” is a great “Who-Done-it”. Of course, I am old enough to have remembered the December 1980 killing of Lennon – as well as that of JFK, King, And RFK. In fact, there are multiple similarities between the assassination of Robert Kennedy and that of John Lennon. Author David Whelan has deeply studied the […]
  • Review: “The Truth About Wuhan” By Dr. Andrew G. Huff
    Want some serious information about the origins of the COVID virus? “The Truth About Wuhan” is the book for you. Dr. Andrew G. Huff was an EcoHealth Alliance Vice President, definitely an insider with specialized knowledge regarding the creation of the Covid virus. The sub-title of the book is “How I Uncovered The Biggest Lie […]
  • Review: The End Of The World Is Just The Beginning
    This book, “The End Of The World..” by Peter Zeihan was quite interesting to read and share. Clearly, I had never heard of Zeihan, mainly because my political analysis has been way different, and it appears he mainly writes for the investor class. With that said, I really liked reading this book. As I wrote, […]
  • Why I Have Stopped Reading “End Of The World” Books
    Why I Am Not Reading “End of the World” Books Anymore I have come to somewhat of a decision, at least for now. I have chosen not to read more “How the world ends” stuff anymore (at least for a while). Here is what I mean; I believe the scenarios as presented, and if they […]
  • Things Were Really Different (Boy I Am Getting Old)
    How Different Things Were Then I write this on Christmas day, 2023. I moved to the island ( in a converted school bus) in October of ’95. I know I sound like an old man, which I am becoming, but things really were different back then. When I first moved here to the island, there […]